When
the sources and financial statements of lobbying firms or
associations are not disclosed, lobbying may become an
anti-democratic endeavor, as it hinders the ability of the
electors to hold politicians directly accountable to them. It
introduces another - often hidden - level between the people and
their elected representatives.
Another
danger to democracy is that
lobbying firms and organizations may exercise power and
influence over the media (or have their own media) and may keep
the electors uninformed about the real reasons for legislative
change or, worse, misinform the electors to the benefit of a
restricted group.
"Lobbying
makes a real contribution to the political and decisional
process by being overt rather than covert. This happens through
providing information, data and analysis furnished by sector
specialists, enabling public decision-makers to make decisions
with the widest possible knowledge on the matter."1
This
kind of approach is accepted more in Canada (and the US), where
there is regulation of lobbyists’ activities, than in Europe.
For example, "in the political and journalistic Italian
lexicon, lobbying is a synonym of corruption: "After
the scandal of Tangentopoli, the bribe-taking allegations that
brought down the government of Bettino Craxi in the 1990s,
lobbying is a hard concept to sell to Italian voters. It is apt
to be perceived as a murky world in which pressure groups push
for ‘unknown’ interests on the margins of democratic
legitimacy."1
REFERENCES:
[1] Public Affairs News Article: "REGIONAL
ANALYSIS – ITALY: MISJUDGED AND MALIGNED", By
Franco Spicciariello